Neoplatonism and the Path to the One

Plotinus lived about 600 years after Plato, the famous student of Socrates. He lived an austere and highly disciplined life centered on philosophy and inner contemplation. He was said to eat very little—often only one meal a day or even less—avoided luxuries and bodily indulgence, and spent much of his time in quiet reflection, teaching, and conversation with students rather than pursuing public life.

This unusual man became the founding figure in synthesizing the insights of Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics into what we now call Neoplatonism—a vision of reality that offers a coherent metaphysical path back to the One.

The Foundations of Henayana

Neoplatonism is foundational to Henayana, the Path to the One, in shaping both our metaphysics and our soteriology. Metaphysics, in this context, concerns the philosophical study of the fundamental nature of reality—existence, being, and first causes.

The historical Buddha, Gotama, tended to avoid metaphysical questions and focused instead on the practical path of Liberation. His followers, however, were never satisfied with this, which is why Mahayana emerged. Mahayana filled in the metaphysical gaps with innovations such as Buddha‑nature, pure lands, celestial bodhisattvas, and the erasing of the Gotama’s distinction between samsara and Nirvana.

Henayana, by contrast, seeks to augment rather than contradict the historical teachings of Gotama. It does this by bringing in the best insights from science, psychology, and Western philosophy.

The Neoplatonic Structure of Reality

Neoplatonism presents a metaphysical framework in which the structure of the universe corresponds to that of the human psyche. The macrocosm of the cosmos is reflected in the microcosm of the inner life.

Following Plotinus, reality has three major divisions:

– At the highest level, the One is the eternal, ineffable source or Ground of Being.
– The first emanation is the nous, the organizing principle of reality—the demiurge of Plato and the Logos of Stoicism.
– At the lowest level is the physical world.

Our internal psychological makeup mirrors this external order. The One is reflected in consciousness, which is my interpretation of psyche. The nous is reflected in cognition, the information‑processing aspect of the mind. And the physical corresponds to our brain and body.

Descent, Ascent, and Liberation

Another important aspect of Neoplatonism is the idea of descent and ascent. Our consciousness descended from the One into the physical and must now ascend and return to the One. Salvation or liberation is attained through union with the One.

Neoplatonism fills in the gap that Gotama left concerning the nature of reality. Yet it remains incomplete without the addition of process philosophy, which teaches that the world is a matrix of becoming—not of substances but of events.

Neoplatonism, like Buddhism, also accepts karma and rebirth. Most people are not aware that reincarnation was taught by Plato and Plotinus. Philosophers often ignore this inconvenient truth, but reincarnation was at the heart of Western philosophy.

Even more interesting—and rarely discussed—is that Neoplatonism taught a version of Nirvana. If the One is beyond becoming, and we return and are rejoined to the One, we enter into “the unborn, unformed, unmade, unconditioned” (Udāna 8.3). Liberation is attained by ascending out of the conditioned realm. The One is the only reality beyond the conditioned realm. Therefore, union with God is Nirvana. This is Henayana.

A Brief Glimpse into a Vast System

Neoplatonism is a very complex and detailed system subject to various interpretations. This is only the briefest introduction.

The Buddha Believed in the One

Five blind men encounter an elephant in the jungle, each touching a different part to “know” it.

One feels the trunk: “It’s a large snake!”
One grasps the tusk: “No, a spear!”
One touches the leg: “A tree trunk!”
One holds the ear: “A fan!”
One bumps the side: “A wall!”

They argue fiercely, each insisting his version is the truth.

A wise sage explains: “You all grasp fragments of the same elephant. Reality is one, but partial views breed endless strife.”

When I say the Buddha believed in the One, I am talking about the elephant—the whole, not the fragments.

Not a Personal God

The Buddha most certainly did not believe in a personal creator deity like the “Man Upstairs,” a bearded overseer on a throne handing out rewards and punishments. As you can see, everything depends on what you mean by the word “the One.”

In Udana 8.3, the Buddha said:

“There is, monks, an unborn, unbecome, unmade, unconditioned. If, monks, there were not that unborn, unbecome, unmade, unconditioned, you could not know an escape here from the born, become, made, and conditioned.”

I define the One as the unborn, unbecome, unmade, unconditioned. In more modern terms, the One is not a being, but the Ground of Being.

The modern understanding of God as the Ground of Being was not available to the Buddha. At the time, the only “gods” he knew were those of Brahminism. And the Reality he encountered in spiritual experience was not a personal being, but something entirely different.

Therefore, he never called this Reality “God,” though he could call it that today. But even today there are connotations that come attached to the word God, such as maleness.

So even though I sometimes use the word God, I find it safer to follow Plotinus and stick with the One, or in more modern form, the Source. In Buddhism, the One is the Unconditioned. In Daoism, it is the Eternal Dao. In philosophy, it is called the Absolute or Ultimate Reality. Different names, same Reality.

Neoplatonic Buddhism

My aim as a philosopher is to bring together Neoplatonism and Buddhism into a coherent synthesis. In doing so, I draw upon comparative philosophy, current insights from psychology, and what we know from physics and biology.

This project is a life’s work—years of study, contemplation, and struggle have led me toward this synthesis. Many traditions contain profound wisdom, but these two stand out as the finest expressions of the Western and Eastern philosophical worlds.

They meet, I believe, in the same ultimate insight: There is an Unconditioned Reality beyond time and space.

We are Sparks of that Unconditioned Reality—expressions of the One, refracted into the world of becoming. We find ourselves in this matrix of change and growth not by accident, but because becoming is the arena in which the Spark evolves.

Our meaning in life is simple and profound: to return to the One from which we came. This takes place by awakening to our Source and evolving our consciousness, our spark, into the likeness of and harmony with the One. It is the flight of the alone to the Alone – Nirvana.

When Plotinus Meets the Buddha

Plotinus lived roughly six centuries after Plato, the famed student of Socrates. He led an austere, disciplined life devoted to philosophy and inner contemplation. Ancient accounts describe him eating very little—sometimes only a single meal a day—avoiding luxury, and spending most of his time in quiet reflection or conversation with students rather than engaging in public affairs.

This unusual, inward‑turned man became the central figure in Neoplatonism, a grand synthesis of Plato, Aristotle, and the Stoics. His system would become one of the most influential metaphysical frameworks in Western thought.

Why Neoplatonism Matters

Neoplatonism is foundational to Neoplatonic Buddhism, especially in shaping its metaphysics and soteriology. While metaphysics—the study of the fundamental nature of reality—was something the historical Buddha largely avoided, his followers did not. Their desire for metaphysical clarity eventually gave rise to the Mahayana, which introduced innovations such as Buddha‑nature, pure lands, celestial bodhisattvas, and the erasure of the boundary between samsara and nirvana.

Neoplatonic Buddhism takes a different approach. Rather than contradicting the Buddha’s early teachings, it seeks to augment them with the best insights from science, psychology, and Western philosophy. Neoplatonism provides a metaphysical scaffolding that aligns remarkably well with contemplative practice and modern science.

The Structure of Reality

Neoplatonism teaches that the structure of the universe mirrors the structure of the human psyche. The macrocosm of the cosmos is reflected in the microcosm of inner life. Following Plotinus, reality has three major divisions:

– The One — the eternal, ineffable Ground of Being
– The Nous — the first emanation, the organizing principle of reality (the demiurge of Plato, the logos of the Stoics)
– The Physical World — the realm of becoming and change

Our inner life reflects this same triad:

– Consciousness mirrors the One
– Cognition mirrors the Nous—the information‑processing, organizing aspect of mind
– Brain and body mirror the physical world

This parallelism is not merely poetic; it is the basis for the Neoplatonic path of transformation.

Descent, Ascent, and Liberation

Another central theme in Neoplatonism is the movement of descent and ascent. Consciousness descends from the One into the physical realm. Liberation is the reverse movement: the ascent back to the One.

Union with the One is salvation. It is the return to the Source, the rejoining with what the Buddha describes as the “unborn, unformed, unmade, and unconditioned” (Udāna 8.3).

If the One is beyond all becoming, and liberation is union with the One, then union with the One is Nirvana. This is the heart of Neoplatonic Buddhism.

Reincarnation, Karma, and the Western Tradition

Neoplatonism, like Buddhism, accepts karma and rebirth. Many people are unaware that reincarnation was taught not only by Plato but also by Plotinus. Philosophers often ignore this inconvenient truth, yet reincarnation was once central to Western philosophy.

Even more striking is that Neoplatonism contains a concept analogous to nirvana. The ascent out of the conditioned realm and the return to the One is, in essence, liberation. The One alone is beyond conditioning; therefore, union with the One is the highest freedom.

Neoplatonism is a vast and intricate system, open to many interpretations. What I’ve offered here is only a brief introduction.