Category: Theology

“And that you, having been set free from sin, have become enslaved to righteousness” (Rom. 6:18).

The Greek word that is translated as sin is hamartia. It is usually defined as “missing the mark.” Which gives one the picture of aiming an arrow at a target but missing it. This is not what it means.

Sin is not missing the mark, sin means to aim at the wrong object. One is not even aiming at the target. The target is pleasing God. Sin is not trying to please God but failing, sin is not even trying to please God. The aim of sin is pleasing self, not God. Sin is a wrong aim. Sin is selfishness.

Romans 3:9 says that “are under the power of sin.” What does this mean? It means that as long as you are aiming to please self, you cannot please God. Selfishness bends all actions to the ultimate aim of one’s own life and interests. Sin makes you a slave of pleasing self. You are “under the power” of the selfish motive (Rom. 3:9).

And Romans 6:22 explains, “But now that you have been freed from sin [a wrong aim] and enslaved to God [the right aim], the fruit you have leads to sanctification, and the end is eternal life.”

It is not wrong action that leads to separation from God, but the wrong aim of one’s life. Sin is living for oneself rather than God. “No one can serve two masters” (Matt. 6:24). You will either serve self or you will serve God. As Romans 6:23 explains, “For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” Making Jesus Lord means making him master of your life.

The singular “sin” refers to the wrong aim, the dedication of the will to self-gratification. The plural “sins” refers to wrong acts, or selfish acts. These are acts that do not please or honor God. For a Christian, these wrong acts are out of harmony with one’s usual aim of pleasing God. As soon as the pressure of temptation is released, the aim of the will snaps back to pleasing God.

Let’s bring this all together. Let me paraphrase our text, “After being freed from the wrong aim of selfishness, you became slaves to the right aim of benevolence.” Benevolence is good willing, it is willing the highest good of God and humanity.

The LORD is my shepherd;
I shall not want.
He makes me to lie down in green pastures:
he leads me beside the still waters.
He restores my soul:
he leads me in the paths of righteousness
for his name’s sake.

Yes, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death,
I will fear no evil:
for you are with me;
your rod and your staff they comfort me.

You prepare a table before me in the presence of my enemies:
you anoint my head with oil;
my cup runs over.

Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me
all the days of my life:
and I will dwell in the house of the LORD
for ever.

_______

Psalm 23 AKJV

“Biblical inerrancy and infallibility are not accepted by the Episcopal Church.” – The Episcopal Church

Inerrancy and infallibility is the belief that the Bible is without any error whatsoever. They claim that there are no errors in history, science, chronology, or any other area. Most of the time they limit this to the autographs.

The vast majority of Christians are ignorant about scripture, its transmission, its canonicity, and its textual issues. Therefore, they are not in a position to rightly judge the question of the inerrancy and infallibility of the scriptures.

I of course, cannot, in such a short span of time, fully educate anybody on the subject. Suffice it for me to say that the scriptures are not inerrant or infallible. For more information, read The Human Faces of God by Thom Stark or Misquoting Jesus by Bart D. Ehrman.

Copies of Copies

Firstly, no original manuscript written in the apostle’s own hand exist. All we have is copies of copies of copies. And of these copies, no two exactly agree. Of the thousands of manuscripts that exist, no two exactly agree.

Known Errors

Second, there are known errors in the scriptures. That’s why there are counteractions in the Bible. Denying that these contradictions exist, makes one seem gullible.

Purpose of the Bible

Third, the purpose of the Bible is not to educate us on astronomy or physics, but on salvation. Therefore, it focuses upon the relationship between God and humankind.

Not God’s Words

Fourth, the Bible is not the words of God, but contains the words of God. Notice the Bible quotes the serpent as saying:

“You will not die, ⁵ for God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil” (Gen. 3:4-5).

These are not the words of God and they are not true. The Bible, therefore, is not the words of God. The Bible is the words of humans, from a human perspective, and it is the word of God only in the sense of being the word or message about God accepted by the universal Christian community.

Follow the Evidence

Finally, faith should follow evidence. If we are lovers of truth, we must follow the evidence where it leads. It is clear from the evidence that the Bible is a human book.

The Bible was written by people who were moved by God to express their own thoughts and experiences. God led the church to collect these writings, so that we can learn about these people’s experience, and that it might help us find salvation through Christ.

The Articles of Religion of the Episcopal Church say it best:

Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary to salvation: so that whatsoever is not read therein, nor may be proved thereby, is not to be required of any man, that it should be believed as an article of the Faith, or be thought requisite or necessary to salvation.

References

https://www.episcopalchurch.org/glossary/inerrancy-biblical/

The Anglican middle way embraces Orthodox and Charismatic tendencies. But it is not Pentecostal. Let me explain.

Both Pentecostals and Charismatics believe in an infilling of the Holy Spirit that takes place sometime after conversion. This infilling is sometimes also called the baptism in the Holy Spirit, the enduement of power, and charismation (Acts 2:4). It is at the point of this infilling that one receives the spiritual gifts and anointing from God (Acts 1:8).

Many people mistakenly assume that Charismatics are Pentecostal. But there is historically a difference between these two labels.

Pentecostals insist that speaking in tongues is the initial physical evidence of the baptism in the Holy Spirit. If you don’t speak in tongues, you don’t have the baptism in the Holy Spirit. Charismatics would say that such a requirement is unbiblical and that any spiritual gift may serve as evidence that one has been anointed and infilled by the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:30).

Some may wonder if Charismatics would consider themselves Full Gospel. Most would consider themselves such, but still avoid the term. For some people, the term Full Gospel has an arrogant sound to it. It says we have the Full Gospel, while your Gospel is not full.

In fact, I would argue that many churches that call themselves Full Gospel are not full at all. I would like to believe that the Episcopal Church has all the truth, but I know better. No church has all the truth, truth is too big for any one church. This should keep us humble and teachable.

I believe in God,

the Father almighty,
creator of heaven and earth.
I believe in Jesus Christ, his only Son, our Lord.
He was conceived by the power of the Holy Spirit
and born of the Virgin Mary.
He suffered under Pontius Pilate,
was crucified, died, and was buried.
He descended to the dead.
On the third day he rose again.
He ascended into heaven,
and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
He will come again to judge the living and the dead.
I believe in the Holy Spirit,
the holy catholic Church,
the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins,
the resurrection of the body,
and the life everlasting. Amen.

_________
This is from the Daily Office in the Book of Common Prayer according to the Episcopal Church.